Susceptibility to the Muller-lyer illusion, theory-neutral observation, and the diachronic penetrability of the visual input system

Philosophical Psychology 19 (1):79-101 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jerry Fodor has consistently cited the persistence of illusions--especially the M.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The physiognomy of the Mueller-lyer figure.Richard J. Alapack - 1971 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 2 (1):27-47.
Observation reconsidered.Jerry Fodor - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (March):23-43.
Illusions and sense-data.David H. Sanford - 1981 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6 (1):371-385.
V. Franz G. Müller-Lyer.Wilhelm Börner - 1917 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 30 (1-4):95-97.
Perception, illusion, and hallucination.Kazem Sadegh-Zadeh - 1982 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3 (2):159-191.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
608 (#27,633)

6 months
16 (#149,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.

View all 36 references / Add more references