Resolving the Debate on Libertarianism and Abortion

Libertarian Papers 8:267-272 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I take issue with the view that libertarian theory does not imply any particular stand on abortion. Liberty is the absence of interference with people’s wills—interests, wishes, and desires. Only entities that have such are eligible for the direct rights of libertarian theory. Foetuses do not; and if aborted, there is then no future person whose rights are violated. Hence the “liberal” view of abortion: women (especially) may decide whether to bear the children they have conceived. Birth is a good dividing line between the freedom to abort and the point at which society is permitted to take an interest. Once born, children detach from their mothers; no invasion of their bodies is necessary to separate them. Yet some ways of bringing them up can have a negative impact on society. There is a thus legitimate interest in protecting ourselves from the results of truly bad parenting.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The moral significance of spontaneous abortion.T. F. Murphy - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (2):79-83.
What's wrong with Libertarianism. [REVIEW]Jeffrey Friedman - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (3):407-467.
Is there a 'new ethics of abortion'?Raanan Gillon - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (suppl 2):5-9.
What is Libertarianism?Daniel Moseley - 2011 - Basic Income Studies 6 (2):4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-11

Downloads
825 (#17,469)

6 months
88 (#47,151)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jan Narveson
University of Waterloo

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references