Redirecting Feminist Critiques of Science

Hypatia 8 (4):72-84 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Applying the insights of Donna Haraway (1989, 1991) and Helen Longino (1989, 1990), this paper reviews Sandra Harding's (1986a) tripartite model of feminist critiques of science-empiricist, standpoint, and postmodern-and argues that it is based on misunderstandings of the relationship between scientific inquiry, objectivity, and values. An alternative view of scientific inquiry makes it possible to see feminist scientists as postmodern and postmodern feminists as having standpoints.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Feminism and liberalism: a not-so-unhappy marriag.Carla Saen - 2006 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 5 (2):127–146.
Feminist Philosophy.Herta Nagl-Docekal - 2004 - Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Feminist Standpoint Theory as a Form of Naturalist Epistemology.Catherine Hundleby - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
AFTERWORD: The Feminist as Other.Susan Bordo - 1997 - In Janet A. Kourany (ed.), Philosophy in a Feminist Voice: Critiques and Reconstructions. Princeton University Press. pp. 296-312.
Feminist critiques: Harding and Longino.Janet Kourany - 2012 - In James R. Brown (ed.), Philosophy of Science: The Key Thinkers. Continuum Books. pp. 236.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
115 (#151,327)

6 months
29 (#104,925)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?