Synthese 187 (1):65-93 (2012)

Abstract
The Nash-Harsanyi theory of bargaining is usually taken as the correct theory of rational bargaining, and, as such, as the correct theory for the basic political contract for a society. It grafts a theory of cooperation to a base that essentially articulates the perspective of non-cooperative interaction. The resultant theory is supposed make clear how rational bargaining can fully realize the mutual gains that cooperation can make possible. However, its underlying commitment to the concepts of non-cooperative interaction renders this doubtful. I argue for an alternative theory—the theory of Full Cooperation—that avoids this difficulty. As applied to bargaining over the basic political contract, it calls for the selection of the most egalitarian of the Strictly Pareto-Optimal outcomes. This is essentially a version of Rawls’ principle of Justice as Fairness, but it is derived, unlike Rawls’ theory, without appeal to a problematic theory of individual decision-making behind the veil of ignorance. It also provides an alternative basis for what Hart calls the Principle of Mutual Restrictions, and what Rawls’ calls the Duty of Fair Play.
Keywords Cooperation  Rationality  Pareto conditions  Equality  Nash-Harsanyi bargaining
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-011-0032-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,192
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Morals by Agreement.David P. Gauthier - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
Are There Any Natural Rights?H. L. A. Hart - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (2):175-191.
Social Choice and Individual Values.Irving M. Copi - 1952 - Science and Society 16 (2):181-181.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rational Cooperation and the Nash Bargaining Solution.Michael Moehler - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):577-594.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Contractiarianism and Bargaining Theory.Paul Weirich - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:369-385.
Rational Cooperation, Irrational Retaliation.Joe Mintoff - 1993 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74 (4):362-380.
How Egalitarian is Rawls's Theory of Justice?Ian Hunt - 2010 - Philosophical Papers 39 (2):155-181.
The Relevance of Decision Theory to Ethical Theory.Jan Narveson - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (5):497-520.
Rational Choice and Moral Theory.Edward F. McClennen - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (5):521-540.
Rawlsian Justice.Fabienne Peter - 2009 - In Paul Anand, Prastanta Pattanaik & Clemens Puppe (eds.), Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. Oxford University Press. pp. 433--456.
John Rawls.Alex Voorhoeve - 2004 - In Julian Baggini & Jeremy Stangroom (eds.), The Great Thinkers A-Z. Continuum. pp. 199-201.
Why Not Go All the Way.Richard Schuster - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):173-174.
Justice and Peaceful Cooperation.Michael Moehler - 2009 - Journal of Global Ethics 5 (3):195-214.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-10-20

Total views
70 ( #164,281 of 2,507,351 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,155 of 2,507,351 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes