Modality, si! Modal logic, no!

Studia Logica 59 (1):29-32 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is oriented toward the use of modality in artificial intelligence (AI). An agent must reason about what it or other agents know, believe, want, intend or owe. Referentially opaque modalities are needed and must be formalized correctly. Unfortunately, modal logics seem too limited for many important purposes. This article contains examples of uses of modality for which modal logic seems inadequate.I have no proof that modal logic is inadequate, so I hope modal logicians will take the examples as challenges.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
129 (#136,376)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John C. McCarthy
Catholic University of America

Citations of this work

John McCarthy's legacy.Leora Morgenstern & Sheila A. McIlraith - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence 175 (1):1-24.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Semantic Considerations on nonmonotonic Logic.Robert C. Moore - 1985 - Artificial Intelligence 25 (1):75-94.
Autocircumscription.Donald Perlis - 1988 - Artificial Intelligence 36 (2):223-236.

Add more references