Modality and Sovereignty

Philosophia Christi 12 (2):289-296 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two important aspects of O’Connor’s Theism and Ultimate Explanation are explored. The first is whether God’s existence should be considered ontologically necessary. I suggest that although existence is essential to God, it is not a matter of ontological necessity. The second is whether prior to creating God deliberates about what universe or universes to create. I argue that he does not, that to say he does is to mistake creation for a kind of manufacturing. Implications of these claims regarding divine sovereignty are briefly discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
20 (#749,846)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hugh J. McCann
Texas A&M University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references