Philosophy of Science 53 (June):179-99 (1986)

Robert N. McCauley
Emory University
In the course of defending both a unified model of intertheoretic relations in science and scientific realism, Paul Churchland has attempted to reinvigorate eliminative materialism. Churchland's eliminativism operates on three claims: (1) that some intertheoretic contexts involve incommensurable theories, (2) that such contexts invariably require the elimination of one theory or the other, and (3) that the relation of psychology and neuroscience is just such a context. I argue that a more detailed account of intertheoretic relations, which distinguishes between the relations that hold between successive theories at a particular level of analysis over time and those that hold between theories at different levels of analysis at the same time, offers grounds for denying Churchland's second and third claims and, therefore, undermines his eliminativism. The paper concludes by suggesting why it is, nonetheless, not unreasonable, given this more detailed model of intertheoretic relations, to expect the eventual elimination of common sense psychology
Keywords Psychology  Relation  Science  Churchland, P
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289306
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
The Language of Thought.Jerry A. Fodor - 1975 - Harvard University Press.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 29 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
58 ( #198,256 of 2,520,399 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,555 of 2,520,399 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes