Freeing Aristotelian Epagōgē from “Prior Analytics” II 23

Apeiron 40 (4):345-374 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since at least late antiquity, Aristotle’s Prior Analytics B 23 has been misread. Aristotle does not think that an induction is a syllogism made good by complete enumeration. The confusion can be eliminated by considering the nature of the surviving text and watching very closely Aristotle’s moving back and forth between “induction” and “syllogism from induction.” Though he does move freely between them, the two are not synonyms.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Le kitāb al-Ta līl d'Alfarabi.Dominique Mallet - 1994 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 4 (2):317.
Impossibility in the Prior Analytics and Plato's dialectic.B. Castelnérac - 2015 - History and Philosophy of Logic 36 (4):303-320.
Aristotelian Epagoge.D. W. Hamlyn - 1976 - Phronesis 21 (2):167-184.
Die Epagoge Bei Aristoteles.Kurt von Fritz - 1964 - Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
460 (#40,306)

6 months
83 (#51,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John P. McCaskey
Fordham University

Citations of this work

Indução e Ciência em Aristóteles.Tomás Roberto Troster - 2015 - Dissertation, University of São Paulo, Brazil

Add more citations