Effects of the response-shock contingency on the facilitation of discrimination performance

&
Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):694 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0026662

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Discrimination performance as affected by problem difficulty and shock for either the correct or incorrect response.Harry Fowler & George J. Wischner - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (4):413.
Tests of two hypotheses of shock-right facilitation.John P. Seward, Lee D. Roskin, Stephen M. Kosslyn, Stewart R. Greathouse & Harold M. Wexler - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):319.
Shock-right facilitation: Correction training with differential SD availability during an enforced delay following an error.E. A. Domber, H. Fowler & G. J. Wischner - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (2):329.
Effects of pre- and postresponse shock on discrimination performance using a discrete-trials procedure.W. Raney Ellis & John W. Donahoe - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (2):267.
Discrimination performance as affected by training procedure, problem difficulty, and shock for the correct response.H. Fowler, P. F. Spelt & G. J. Wischner - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (4):432.
Acquired (conditional) equivalence: A basis for response-set effects in verbal-discrimination reversal performance.Coleman Paul, Charles D. Hoffman & Stuart Dick - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (3):361.
Facilitation of performance through the use of the timing system.Stuart J. Dimond - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (2):181.
Effects of shock intensity and placement on the learning of a food-reinforced brightness discrimination.Elizabeth R. Curlin & John W. Donahoe - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (4):349.
Immediate vs. delayed shock in T-maze performance.Robert K. Knapp, Richard H. Kause & Charles C. Perkins - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (5):357.
Concerning the effect of shock for right responses in visual discrimination learning.Karl F. Muenzinger - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (2):201.
Shock-right discrimination training: Effect of correction training with an enforced delay following an incorrect choice.Philip F. Spelt & Harry Fowler - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):504.
Effects of response alteration and different instructions on proactive and retroactive facilitation and interference.Howard H. McFann - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (6):405.
Facilitation of response to suggestion by response to previous suggestion of a different type.A. Jenness - 1933 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 16 (1):55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
25 (#595,425)

6 months
6 (#417,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references