Double dissociations never license simple inferences about underlying brain organization, especially in developmental cases

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):763-764 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Different developmental anomalies produce contrasting deficits in a single, integrated system. In a network that inflects regular and exception verbs correctly, a disproportionate deficit with exceptions occurs if connections are deleted, whereas a disproportionate deficit with regulars occurs when an auditory deficit impairs perception of the regular inflection. In general, contrasting deficits do not license the inference of underlying modularity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evidence for a domain-specific deficit in developmental dyslexia.Franck Ramus - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):767-768.
Simple systems and phylogenetic diversity.William C. Wimsatt - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (2):267-275.
Four probability-preserving properties of inferences.Ernest W. Adams - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (1):1 - 24.
Are developmental disabilities the same in children and adults?Paula Tallal - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):768-769.
The Role of Psychology in Functional Localization Research.Barbara V. E. Klein - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:119 - 133.
What can developmental disorders tell us about modularity?Gary F. Marcus - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):762-763.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
15 (#923,100)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references