Logos and Episteme 3 (4):637-652 (2012)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
My purpose in this paper is to defend safety as a necessary condition on knowledge. First, I introduce Ernest Sosa’s safety condition. Second,I set up and grapple with Juan Comesaña’s recent putative counterexample to safety as a necessary condition on knowledge; Comesaña’s case forces us to consider Sosa’s updated safety condition. From such grappling a principled modification to Sosa’s safety condition emerges. Safety is safe from this, and like, attacks.
|
| Keywords | Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy of Mind |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Reprint years | 2012, 2013 |
| ISBN(s) | 2069-0533 |
| DOI | 10.5840/logos-episteme20123413 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Knowledge Under Threat.Tomas Bogardus - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):289-313.
Sosa, Safety, Sensitivity, and Skeptical Hypotheses.Keith DeRose - 2004 - In J. Greco (ed.), Ernest Sosa: And His Critics. Blackwell. pp. 22--41.
Review: Saving God From Saving God. [REVIEW]Andrew Chignell & Dean Zimmerman - 2012 - Books and Culture 15 (3).
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-12-04
Total views
22 ( #510,380 of 2,498,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,498,932 )
2012-12-04
Total views
22 ( #510,380 of 2,498,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,498,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
