The Epistemic Imperialism of Science. Reinvigorating Early Critiques of Scientism

Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Positivism has had a tremendous impact on the development of the social sciences over the past two centuries. It has deeply influenced method and theory, and has seeped deeply into our broader understandings of the nature of the social sciences. Postmodernism has attempted to loosen the grip of positivism on our thinking, and while it has not been without its successes, postmodernism has worked more to deconstruct positivism than to construct something new in its place. Psychologists today perennially wrestle to find and retain their intellectual balance within the methodological, theoretical, and epistemological struggles between positivism and postmodernism. In the process, pre-postmodern criticisms of positivism have been largely forgotten. Although they remain deeply buried at the core of psychology, these early alternatives to positivism are rarely given explicit hearing today. The current piece explores some of the early critiques of positivism, particularly of its scientism, as well as early suggestions to tip the scales in favor ofsapientia. This third option, largely overlooked within mainstream psychology, is of tremendous value today as it is both deconstructive and constructive relative to the shortcomings of positivism. It avoids the overly reductionistic “trivial order” of positivism, as well as the deeply unsatisfying and disorienting “barbaric vagueness” of postmodernism, while simultaneously embracing important core elements of both currents of thought.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Schlick's Critique of Positivism.Joia Lewis - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:110 - 117.
The legacy of positivism.Michael Singer - 2005 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Commentary and criticism on scientific positivism.Dr Penny J. Gilmer - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):71-72.
Positivism before Logical Positivism in Nordic Philosophy.Carl-göran Heidegren - 2010 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 14:91-103.
Legal positivism: Still descriptive and morally neutral.Andrei Marmor - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (4):683-704.
Positivism, post-positivism and postmodernism.Evaldas Nekrasas - 2005 - In Jurate Baranova (ed.), Contemporary Philosophical Discourse in Lithuania. Council for Research in Values and Philosophy. pp. 4--145.
Hart's Methodological Positivism.Stephen R. Perry - 1998 - Legal Theory 4 (4):427-467.
Reconsidering Logical Positivism. [REVIEW]Eric D. Hetherington - 2000 - Review of Metaphysics 54 (2):428-430.
The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism.Torben Spaak (ed.) - 2021 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Positivism Before Hart.Fred Schauer - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24 (2):455-471.
The Relational Nature of Species Concepts.José E. Burgos - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 37:9-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-07

Downloads
12 (#929,405)

6 months
5 (#246,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Personal knowledge.Michael Polanyi - 1958 - Chicago,: University of Chicago Press.
Objectivity.Lorraine Daston & Peter Galison - 2007 - Cambridge, Mass.: Zone Books. Edited by Peter Galison.
The Concept of Nature: Tarner Lectures.Alfred North Whitehead - 1920 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.
The Nature of the Physical World.A. Eddington - 1928 - Humana Mente 4 (14):252-255.

View all 37 references / Add more references