The Modern Olympics & Post-Modern Athletics

Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 10:1-17 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While the overwhelming majority of professions do not regulate the use of performance enhancements, athletics has become a lightning rod. Analysis of the current policies regulating athletic enhancements reveals that drawing the line on what is permitted is an ethically and politically arbitrary process, and sport governing bodies hold athletes to a different standard. The World Anti-Doping Agency uses “the spirit of sport” as criteria for banning enhancements while recent findings in genomics reveals the spirit of being human is to take advantage of what is available for survival. These contradictions question the reasoning and validity of the current regulations of athletic enhancements.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Athletics, embodiment, and the appropriation of the self.Leslie A. Howe - 2003 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 17 (2):92-107.
Modern Sport as an Opportunity to Form a Sense of Self.Masami Sekine & Takayuki Hata - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 47:35-43.
Towards One Kind of Social Science as Phronesis.Hongwen Zhu - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 46:121-127.
Modern Athletics.G. M. Butler - 2013 - Cambridge University Press.
Performance-Enhancing Technologies and the Values of Athletic Competition.David Wasserman - 2008 - Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 28 (3/4):22-27.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-14

Downloads
10 (#1,123,760)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references