The Journal of Ethics 1 (4):325-340 (1997)

It is often held that according to Aristotle the city is a natural organism. One major reason for this organic interpretation is no doubt that Aristotle describes the relationship between the individual and the city as a part-whole relationship, seemingly the same relationship that holds between the parts of a natural organism and the organism itself. Moreover, some scholars (most notably Jonathan Barnes) believe this view of the city led Aristotle to accept an implicit totalitarianism. I argue, however, that an investigation of the various ways Aristotle describes parts and wholes reveals that for Aristotle the city has a unity (and thus a nature) quite different from that of a natural organism.
Keywords Aristotle  part  whole  unity  politics  totalitarianism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004, 2016
DOI 10.1023/a:1009743012461
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,043
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Exchange.[author unknown] - 2008 - Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (1):49-90.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Collective Responsibility: Organizations as Organic Entities.Robert Albin - 2016 - Open Journal of Philosophy 6 (4):392-405.
Politics and Collective Action in Thomas Aquinas's On Kingship.Anselm Spindler - 2019 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 57 (3):419-442.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
61 ( #185,187 of 2,498,734 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,098 of 2,498,734 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes