On Oppy’s Objections to the Modal Perfection Argument

Philo 8 (2):123-130 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a reply to Graham Oppy’s “Maydole’s 2QS5 Argument,” published in Philo 7, 2 (2004). I argue that he fails to refute myModal Perfection Argument for the existence of a Supreme Being, and that it remains arguably sound in the face of his alleged counterexamples and parodies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Maydole’s 2QS5 Argument.Graham Oppy - 2004 - Philo 7 (2):203-211.
Maydole on Ontological Arguments.Graham Oppy - 2012 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 445.
Response to Maydole.Graham Oppy - 2012 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 445-68.
The Necessity of Perfection: Modal Versions of the Ontological Argument.John Thomas Birmingham - 2001 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
A Logical Choice.Tracy Lupher - 2012 - Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (1):237-246.
Modal theistic arguments.Graham Oppy - 1993 - Sophia 32 (2):17-24.
Ontological arguments.Graham Oppy - 2014 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
16 (#855,572)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references