Your Good Name: The Relationship Between Perceived Reputational Risk and Acceptability of Negotiation Tactics [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 106 (2):161-175 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Reputation serves important functions in social interactions. As a result, negotiators should be concerned about protecting their reputations. Using an online experiment with 343 respondents, we examined the impact of perceived reputational risk on the acceptability of potentially questionable tactics. Consistent with and extending previous findings, we found that, the more reputational risk negotiators perceive, the less acceptable they find the tactics to be. In addition, in the business negotiation context, females generally viewed questionable tactics as more reputationally risky and consequently less acceptable than did males, especially when they were primed to think of themselves as being powerful. We end our paper with discussions on contributions and implications of the findings

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Safety, risk acceptability, and morality.James A. E. Macpherson - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):377-390.
Negotiation, Persuasion and Argument.Chris Provis - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (1):95-112.
Reputation Shifting.John F. Mahon & Barry M. Mitnick - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:267-272.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-18

Downloads
32 (#485,568)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?