Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (2):201-202 (1996)
| Abstract |
The value of accuracy and quantity as memory measures is assessed. It is argued that accuracy does not measure correspondence because it ignores omissions and correct rejections, quantity is confounded with monitoring in recall, and in recognition, if targets and foils are unequal, both measures, even together, still ignore correct rejections.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0140525x00042278 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition.James J. Gibson - 1979 - Houghton Mifflin.
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1689 - London, England: Oxford University Press.
Women, Fire and Dangerous Thing: What Catergories Reveal About the Mind.George Lakoff (ed.) - 1987 - University of Chicago Press.
View all 111 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Recall and Recognition Measures of the Von Restorff Effect in Serial Learning.John P. Mclaughlin - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (1):99.
Construct Validity of Recall and Recognition Postconditioning Measures of Awareness.Michael E. Dawson & Paul Reardon - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (2):308.
An Examination of Recognition and Free Recall as Measures of Acquisition and Long-Term Retention.Darryl Bruce & Charles N. Cofer - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (3):283.
The Effect of Verbalization During Observation of Stimulus Objects Upon Accuracy of Recognition and Recall.Kenneth H. Kurtz & Carl I. Hovland - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (3):157.
Quantity Recognition Among Speakers of an Anumeric Language.Caleb Everett & Keren Madora - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (1):130-141.
Effects of Prior Free Recall Testing on Final Recall and Recognition.Charles F. Darley & Bennet B. Murdock - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (1):66.
Recall, Recognition, and the Medial Temporal Lobes.Barbara J. Knowlton - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):455-456.
The Effect of Recall Upon Recognition.Nelson G. Hanawalt & Arlene G. Tarr - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (4):361.
Free and Modified Free Recall Measures of Response Recall and Unlearning.Dennis J. Delprato & Bertram E. Garskof - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (2):408.
Effects of Test Expectancy on Children’s Recall and Recognition.James W. Hall, Rosemarie Miskiewicz & Cheryl Gaymurray - 1977 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 10 (5):425-428.
Recognition and Recall of Positively Forgotten Items.Jonathan C. Davis & Ronald Okada - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (1):181.
Recognition and Recall as a Function of Instructional Manipulations of Organization.Robert M. Schwartz & Michael S. Humphreys - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (3):517.
What Are the Functional Deficits Produced by Hippocampal and Perirhinal Cortex Lesions?A. R. Mayes, R. van Eijk, P. A. Gooding, C. L. Isaac & J. S. Holdstock - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):460-461.
Speed and Accuracy of Sentence Recall: Effects of Ear of Presentation, Semantics, and Grammar.Robert J. Jarvella & Steven J. Herman - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (1):108.
When is Recall Spectacularly Higher Than Recognition?Michael J. Watkins - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (1):161.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-01-20
Total views
16 ( #668,797 of 2,520,354 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,520,354 )
2014-01-20
Total views
16 ( #668,797 of 2,520,354 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,520,354 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
