Philosophy 76 (2):297-303 (2001)
AbstractIn my book The Comprehensibility of the Universe (OUP, 1998), I argue for a new conception of science that construes science as adopting a hierarchy of increasingly contentless cosmological assumptions about the comprehensibility and knowability of the universe. This view, I argue, solves outstanding problems about science, such as problems of induction, simplicity and verisimilitude. In his essay review of my book (Philosophy 75, 2000, 296–309) Friedel Weinert criticizes me for defending a number of views about science. But, as I make clear from quotations from the book, I do not defend the views that Weinert attributes to me.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Similar books and articles
A Priori Conjectural Knowledge in Physics: The Comprehensibility of the Universe.Nicholas Maxwell - 2005 - In Michael Veber & Michael Shaffer (eds.), What Place for the A Priori? Chicago: Open Court. pp. 211-240.
The Problem of Induction and Metaphysical Assumptions Concerning the Comprehensibility and Knowability of the Universe.Nicholas Maxwell - 2007 - PhilSci Archive.
Has Science Established That the Universe is Comprehensible?Nicholas Mazwell - 1999 - Cogito 13 (2):139-145.
The Comprehensibility of the World by Nicholas Maxwell Clarendon Press, Oxford, XV + 316pp. On a Purported Error About the Doctrine of Double Effect: A Reply to Sophie Botros.Friedel Weinert - 2000 - Philosophy 75 (2):296-312.
Must Science Make Cosmological Assumptions If It is to Be Rational?Nicholas Maxwell - 1997 - In T. Kelly (ed.), The Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the Irish Philosophical Society Spring Conference. Irish Philosophical Society.
Nicholas Maxwell, the Comprehensibility of the Universe: A New Conception of Science.J. J. C. Smart - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):907-911.