Consciousness and Cognition 12 (3):376-402 (2003)
AbstractThree experiments explore the role of working memory in motor skill acquisition and performance. Traditional theories postulate that skill acquisition proceeds through stages of knowing, which are initially declarative but later procedural. The reported experiments challenge that view and support an independent, parallel processing model, which predicts that procedural and declarative knowledge can be acquired separately and that the former does not depend on the availability of working memory, whereas, the latter does. The behaviour of these two processes was manipulated by providing or withholding visual (and auditory) appraisal of outcome feedback. Withholding feedback was predicted to inhibit the use of working memory to appraise success and, thus, prevent the formation of declarative knowledge without affecting the accumulation of procedural knowledge. While the first experiment failed to support these predictions, the second and third experiments demonstrated that procedural and declarative knowledge can be acquired independently. It is suggested that the availability of working memory is crucial to motor performance only when the learner has come to rely on its use.
Similar books and articles
Being the Agent: Memory for Action Events.Elena Daprati, Daniele Nico, Nicolas Franck & Angela Sirigu - 2003 - Consciousness and Cognition 12 (4):670-683.
Working Memory and Reasoning: An Individual Differences Perspective.Alison Capon, Simon Handley & Ian Dennis - 2003 - Thinking and Reasoning 9 (3):203 – 244.
A Constructivist and Connectionist View on Conscious and Nonconscious Processes.R. H. Phaf & G. Wolters - 1997 - Philosophical Psychology 10 (3):287-307.
Varieties of Procedural Accounts of Working Memory Retention Systems.Nelson Cowan - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):731-732.
More Than Working Memory Rides on Long-Term Memory.Joaquín M. Fuster - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):737-737.
Pre-Frontal Executive Committee for Perception, Working Memory, Attention, Long-Term Memory, Motor Control, and Thinking: A Tutorial Review.Bill Faw - 2003 - Consciousness and Cognition 12 (1):83-139.
Incorporating Semantics and Individual Differences in Models of Working Memory.Janice M. Keenan, Jukka Hyönä & Johanna K. Kaakinen - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):742-742.
Working Memory Capacity and the Hemispheric Organization of the Brain.Gabriele Gratton, Monica Fabiani & Paul M. Corballis - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):121-122.
The Role of Working Memory in Motor Learning and Performance.P. J., W. S. & F. F. - 2003 - Consciousness and Cognition 12 (3):376-402.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Somatosensory Processes Subserving Perception and Action.H. Chris Dijkerman & Edward H. F. de Haan - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (2):189-201.
Comparing Multiple Paths to Mastery: What is Learned?Timothy J. Nokes & Stellan Ohlsson - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (5):769-796.
Marginally Perceptible Outcome Feedback, Motor Learning and Implicit Processes.Rich S. W. Masters, Jon P. Maxwell & Frank F. Eves - 2009 - Consciousness and Cognition 18 (3):639-645.
Scaling Sporting Equipment for Children Promotes Implicit Processes During Performance.Tim Buszard, Damian Farrow, Machar Reid & Rich S. W. Masters - 2014 - Consciousness and Cognition 30:247-255.
Passing Thoughts on the Evolutionary Stability of Implicit Motor Behaviour: Performance Retention Under Physiological Fatigue.J. M. Poolton, R. S. W. Masters & J. P. Maxwell - 2007 - Consciousness and Cognition 16 (2):456-468.
References found in this work
Characteristics of Dissociable Human Learning Systems.David R. Shanks & Mark F. St John - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (3):367-395.
Two Modes of Learning for Interactive Tasks.Neil A. Hayes & Donald E. Broadbent - 1988 - Cognition 28 (3):249-276.
Synthetic Grammar Learning: Implicit Rule Abstraction or Explicit Fragmentary Knowledge.Pierre Perruchet & C. Pacteau - 1990 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 119:264-75.