The problem of evil and moral indifference

Religious Studies 35 (3):323-345 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that if the libertarian free will defence were seen to fail because determinism were seen to be true, then another solution to the problem of evil would present itself. I start by arguing that one cannot, by consideration of agents' choices between morally indifferent options, reach any conclusion as to these agents' moral qualities. If certain forms of consequentialism were false, determinism true, and if there were a God who chose to create this universe, then His choice would have been between such options. Consideration of the general nature of the universe God putatively chose to create would not then license any conclusion as His moral qualities

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Necessary Evil: Justification, Excuse or Pardon? [REVIEW]Vinit Haksar - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):333-347.
The Problem of Evil and a Plausible Defence.Frank J. Murphy - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (2):243-250.
Axiology, realism, and the problem of evil.Thomas L. Carson - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):349–368.
God, the Best, and Evil.Bruce Langtry - 2008 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Divine Freedom and the Problem of Evil.Theodore Guleserian - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (3):348-366.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
88 (#189,554)

6 months
28 (#106,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

T. J. Mawson
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Why God allows undeserved horrendous evil.Scott Hill - 2022 - Religious Studies 58 (4):772-786.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references