Why Bohm's theory solves the measurement problem

Philosophy of Science 62 (3):479-483 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abraham Stone recently has published an argument purporting to show that David Bohm's interpretation of quantum mechanics fails to solve the measurement problem. Stone's analysis is not correct, as he has failed to take account of the conditions under which the theorems he cites are proven. An explicit presentation of a Bohmian measurement illustrates the flaw in his reasoning

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
371 (#52,108)

6 months
22 (#119,049)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tim Maudlin
New York University

Citations of this work

The physics and metaphysics of Tychistic Bohmian Mechanics.Patrick Duerr & Alexander Ehmann - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 90:168-183.
The measurement problem revisited.Shan Gao - 2019 - Synthese 196 (1):299-311.
Why the quantum?Jeffrey Bub - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (2):241-266.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Does the Bohm theory solve the measurement problem?Abraham D. Stone - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (2):250-266.

Add more references