Religion and morality: An anthropological comment

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):465-466 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This commentary criticises Bering on two counts. First, because we do not know what he attributes to natural selection and what he sees as derived representations. Second, Bering's ethnography of religion is inadequate. People who practise ancestor worship are not concerned with their own survival but with that of others. Many supernatural beings are not thought of as morally motivated.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is religion dangerous?Keith Ward - 2006 - Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Pub. Co..
The evolution of morality and religion.Donald M. Broom - 2003 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Morality and cultural differences.John Webber Cook - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Religion and morality.Dewi Zephaniah Phillips (ed.) - 1996 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
F.j.J. Buytendijk's concept of an anthropological physiology.Wim J. M. Dekkers - 1995 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
20 (#703,484)

6 months
3 (#760,965)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Explaining moral religions.Nicolas Baumard & Pascal Boyer - 2013 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (6):272-280.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references