Analysis 71 (2):303-303 (2011)
Authors |
Lynne Rudder Baker
PhD: Vanderbilt University; Last affiliation: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
|
Abstract |
Anselm: I agreed that Pegasus is a flying horse according to the stories people tell, the paintings painters paint and so on . That is, Pegasus is a flying horse in the understanding of storytellers, their readers and the artists who depict Pegasus. You asked whether flying is not an unmediated causal power . Well, it could be an unmediated causal power if you or I had it, but not if a being with only mediated powers had it. And so poor Pegasus, a being whose powers are only those given him by storytellers and artists, has only the mediated power of flying that they have given him. He flies in the thoughts and depictions of beings with unmediated powers. Still, Pegasus has not only the mediated power to fly but also the mediated power to entertain us, and perhaps even inspire us. Fool: But people could tell stories about you, too, about how you sprouted wings and flew onto the roof of Canterbury Cathedral. Anselm: Alas, if it were only in stories that I could do that, then flying would not be an unmediated causal power of mine. I would still have unmediated causal powers all right, and so would be greater than Pegasus. But flying is not one of my unmediated causal powers. However, something than which nothing greater can be conceived would, and does, as I have proved in my Proslogion, have unmediated causal powers – indeed, much greater unmediated causal powers than any poor mortals like you and me.1 •↵1 For …
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1093/analys/anr012 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Ontological Argument Simplified.Gareth B. Matthews & Lynne Rudder Baker - 2010 - Analysis 70 (2):210-212.
Citations of this work BETA
The Ontological Argument and Objects of Thought.Edward Wierenga - 2011 - Philosophic Exchange 42 (1):82-103.
Similar books and articles
Defeasible Reasoning, Special Pleading and the Cosmological Argument: A Reply to Oppy.Robert C. Koons - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (2):192-203.
St. Anselm's Proslogion with a Reply on Behalf of the Fool by Gaunilo and the Author's Reply to Gaunilo. Translated by M. J. Charlesworth with an Introduction and Philosophical Commentary. Oxford University Press, 1965. Pp. 196. $5.95. [REVIEW]John Trentman - 1968 - Dialogue 6 (4):614-616.
Hobbes's Fool the Stultus, Grotius, and the Epicurean Tradition.Patricia Springborg - 2010 - Hobbes Studies 23 (1):29-53.
How Fool Is a "Holy Fool"?Agneta Schreurs - 2007 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 13 (3):205-210.
Paley’s Argument Revisited: Reply to Schupbach.Graham Oppy - 2008 - Philosophia Christi 10 (2):443-450.
Inverse Operations with Transfinite Numbers and the Kalam Cosmological Argument.Graham Oppy - 1995 - International Philosophical Quarterly 35 (2):219-221.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-02-05
Total views
97 ( #122,161 of 2,520,788 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,623 of 2,520,788 )
2011-02-05
Total views
97 ( #122,161 of 2,520,788 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,623 of 2,520,788 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads