On the Experiential Link Between Spatial and Temporal Language

Cognitive Science 29 (4):655-664 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


How do we understand time and other entities we can neither touch nor see? One possibility is that we tap into our concrete, experiential knowledge, including our understanding of physical space and motion, to make sense of abstract domains such as time. To examine how pervasive an aspect of cognition this is, we investigated whether thought about a nonliteral type of motion called fictive motion (FM; as in The road runs along the coast) can influence thought about time. Our results suggest that FM uses the same structures evoked in understanding literal motion, and that these literal aspects of FM influence temporal reasoning.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,621

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Spatial semiosis and time.Leonid Tchertov - 2005 - Sign Systems Studies 33 (2):297-314.
Temporal Parts.Theodore Sider - 2007 - In Theodore Sider, John Hawthorne & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Blackwell. pp. 241--262.
Spatial semiosis in culture.Leonid Tchertov - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (2):441-453.
Temporal parts and complex predicates.Thomas Sattig - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (3):279–286.
Experience and time.Ian Phillips - 2009 - Dissertation, Ucl
Quantum mechanics and ordinary language: The fuzzy link.Peter J. Lewis - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1437-1446.
Temporal language and temporal reality.Heather Dyke - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):380–391.


Added to PP

32 (#425,783)

6 months
1 (#1,011,292)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?