Legal Argumentation and Evidence [Book Review]

Dialogue 43 (3):607-609 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00122173

DOI

10.1017/s0012217300003140

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Legal Argumentation and Evidence. [REVIEW]Peter B. Rutledge - 2004 - Review of Metaphysics 58 (2):471-473.
Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: Argumentation schemes and generalisations. [REVIEW]Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Chris Reed & Douglas Walton - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):125-165.
Pluralismo argomentativo. Sull’argomentazione dell’interpretazione.Mauro Barberis - 2006 - Etica E Politica 8 (1):1-21.
A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):349-367.
The Nature and the Place of Presumptions in Law and Legal Argumentation.Raymundo Gama - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (3):555-572.
Topics in Contemporary Legal Argumentation: Some Remarks on the Topical Nature of Legal Argumentation in the Continental Law Tradition.Guenther Kreuzbauer - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (1):71-85.
Finocchiaro, Maurice., Meta-argumentation: An Approach to Logic and Argumentation Theory. [REVIEW]Daniel Cohen - 2013 - Review of Metaphysics 67 (2):428-430.
Argumentation in ethics, legal dogmatics and legal practice.Aleksander Peczenik - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):747-756.
The Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Teleological Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (4):489-506.
The Rational Reconstruction of Argumentation Referring to Consequences and Purposes in the Application of Legal Rules: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Eveline T. Feteris - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):459-470.
In the Field – The Development of Reasons in Criminal Proceedings.Kati Hannken-Illjes - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):309-325.
Philosophical Assumptions in Legal Philosophy: A Critique of Contemporary Philosophy of Law.Maricarmen Marshall Jenkins - 1999 - Dissertation, Mcmaster University (Canada)
The Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Teleological-Evaluative Argumentation in Complex Structures of Legal Justification.Eveline Feteris - unknown
Argument from Expert Opinion as Legal Evidence: Critical Questions and Admissibility Criteria of Expert Testimony in the American Legal System.David M. Godden & Douglas Walton - 2006 - Ratio Juris 19 (3):261-286.
Legal Practices and the Reason of the Law.Kurt Nutting - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (1):111-133.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
32 (#487,332)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Matheson
Carleton University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references