Forcing axioms, supercompact cardinals, singular cardinal combinatorics

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (1):99-113 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The purpose of this communication is to present some recent advances on the consequences that forcing axioms and large cardinals have on the combinatorics of singular cardinals. I will introduce a few examples of problems in singular cardinal combinatorics which can be fruitfully attacked using ideas and techniques coming from the theory of forcing axioms and then translate the results so obtained in suitable large cardinals properties.The first example I will treat is the proof that the proper forcing axiom PFA implies the singular cardinal hypothesis SCH, this will easily lead to a new proof of Solovay's theorem that SCH holds above a strongly compact cardinal. I will also outline how some of the ideas involved in these proofs can be used as means to evaluate the “saturation” properties of models of strong forcing axioms like MM or PFA.The second example aims to show that the transfer principle ↠ fails assuming Martin's Maximum MM. Also in this case the result can be translated in a large cardinal property, however this requires a familiarity with a rather large fragment of Shelah's pcf-theory.Only sketchy arguments will be given, the reader is referred to the forthcoming [25] and [38] for a thorough analysis of these problems and for detailed proofs.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,264

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some structural results concerning supercompact cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1919-1927.
Gap forcing: Generalizing the lévy-Solovay theorem.Joel David Hamkins - 1999 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):264-272.
Consecutive Singular Cardinals and the Continuum Function.Arthur W. Apter & Brent Cody - 2013 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 54 (2):125-136.
Small forcing makes any cardinal superdestructible.Joel David Hamkins - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (1):51-58.
On measurable limits of compact cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1675-1688.
Projective Well-Orderings and Bounded Forcing Axioms.Andrés Eduardo Caicedo - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (2):557 - 572.
The Proper Forcing Axiom and the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis.Matteo Viale - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (2):473 - 479.
A maximal bounded forcing axiom.David Asperó - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (1):130-142.
Co-stationarity of the Ground Model.Natasha Dobrinen & Sy-David Friedman - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (3):1029 - 1043.
PFA and Ideals on $\omega_{2}$ Whose Associated Forcings Are Proper.Sean Cox - 2012 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (3):397-412.
Ad and patterns of singular cardinals below θ.Arthur W. Apter - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (1):225-235.
Large cardinals and large dilators.Andy Lewis - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (4):1496-1510.
Unfoldable cardinals and the GCH.Joel David Hamkins - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1186-1198.


Added to PP

25 (#465,473)

6 months
1 (#449,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reflecting stationary sets.Menachem Magidor - 1982 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 (4):755-771.
A very weak square principle.Matthew Foreman & Menachem Magidor - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (1):175-196.
Set Theory.Thomas Jech - 1999 - Studia Logica 63 (2):300-300.
The strenght of the failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis.Moti Gitik - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 51 (3):215-240.
Fragments of Martin's Maximum in generic extensions.Y. Yoshinobu & B. Konig - 2004 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 50 (3):297.

View all 10 references / Add more references