Forcing axioms, supercompact cardinals, singular cardinal combinatorics
Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (1):99-113 (2008)
Abstract
The purpose of this communication is to present some recent advances on the consequences that forcing axioms and large cardinals have on the combinatorics of singular cardinals. I will introduce a few examples of problems in singular cardinal combinatorics which can be fruitfully attacked using ideas and techniques coming from the theory of forcing axioms and then translate the results so obtained in suitable large cardinals properties.The first example I will treat is the proof that the proper forcing axiom PFA implies the singular cardinal hypothesis SCH, this will easily lead to a new proof of Solovay's theorem that SCH holds above a strongly compact cardinal. I will also outline how some of the ideas involved in these proofs can be used as means to evaluate the “saturation” properties of models of strong forcing axioms like MM or PFA.The second example aims to show that the transfer principle ↠ fails assuming Martin's Maximum MM. Also in this case the result can be translated in a large cardinal property, however this requires a familiarity with a rather large fragment of Shelah's pcf-theory.Only sketchy arguments will be given, the reader is referred to the forthcoming [25] and [38] for a thorough analysis of these problems and for detailed proofs.DOI
10.2178/bsl/1208358846
My notes
Similar books and articles
Some structural results concerning supercompact cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1919-1927.
Gap forcing: Generalizing the lévy-Solovay theorem.Joel David Hamkins - 1999 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):264-272.
Exactly controlling the non-supercompact strongly compact cardinals.Arthur W. Apter & Joel David Hamkins - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (2):669-688.
Consecutive Singular Cardinals and the Continuum Function.Arthur W. Apter & Brent Cody - 2013 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 54 (2):125-136.
Small forcing makes any cardinal superdestructible.Joel David Hamkins - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (1):51-58.
On measurable limits of compact cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1675-1688.
Projective Well-Orderings and Bounded Forcing Axioms.Andrés Eduardo Caicedo - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (2):557 - 572.
The Proper Forcing Axiom and the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis.Matteo Viale - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (2):473 - 479.
Co-stationarity of the Ground Model.Natasha Dobrinen & Sy-David Friedman - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (3):1029 - 1043.
PFA and Ideals on $\omega_{2}$ Whose Associated Forcings Are Proper.Sean Cox - 2012 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (3):397-412.
Ad and patterns of singular cardinals below θ.Arthur W. Apter - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (1):225-235.
Unfoldable cardinals and the GCH.Joel David Hamkins - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1186-1198.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-30
Downloads
25 (#465,473)
6 months
1 (#449,844)
2010-08-30
Downloads
25 (#465,473)
6 months
1 (#449,844)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
A very weak square principle.Matthew Foreman & Menachem Magidor - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (1):175-196.
The strenght of the failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis.Moti Gitik - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 51 (3):215-240.
Fragments of Martin's Maximum in generic extensions.Y. Yoshinobu & B. Konig - 2004 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 50 (3):297.