Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (4):575-598 (2003)

Authors
Carl Alan Matheson
University of Manitoba
Abstract
In his Art and Knowledge, the distinguished Canadian philosopher of art, James O. Young, takes on the daunting task of defending his opening claim that ‘every item properly classified as a work of art can contribute to human knowledge’. His assertion is a general one, intended to apply to any and every prospective artwork, not merely to sub-genres like the moral novel or the ‘Shock-Headed Peter’ school of didactic bedtime terror-fest. Thus, according to Young, works such as The Well-Tempered Clavier and Vermeer’s Officer and Laughing Girl do not qualify as art unless they can provide knowledge about topics that are important to us as human beings. A work does not become artworthy by inspiring us to meditate, ruminate, or reflect unless the work also leads us to true beliefs that are, in some sense, justified. Furthermore, it’s not enough for a work to provide knowledge about, say, abstruse issues in eighteenth-century counterpoint or the cult of painterly flatness; to count as art, a work must, in some way, supply answers to questions that are important to us as human beings living in the world. Young also argues that artworks have their own method of conveying knowledge. Hence, he buttresses his cognitive definition of art with an epistemology of art.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0045-5091
DOI 10.1080/00455091.2003.10716556
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Critical Notice of James O. Young, Art and Knowledge.Carl Matheson & Evan Kirchhoff - 2003 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (4):575-598.
Critical Notice.Christian Piller - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (2):347-367.
Critical Notice of Robert Audi, The Good in the Right.Anthony Skelton - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):305-325.
Critical Notice of Larry S. Temkin Inequality.Dennis Mckerlie - 1995 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):623-636.
Critical Notice.A. E. Taylor - 1943 - Mind 52 (206):91-105.
Critical Notice.B. A. O. Williams - 1957 - Mind 66 (261):99 - 109.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-22

Total views
20 ( #560,772 of 2,520,804 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,623 of 2,520,804 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes