Alan F. Chalmers: The Scientist’s Atom and the Philosopher’s Stone: How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms

Science & Education 20 (2):173-190 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11191-010-9226-2

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Alan Chalmers. The Scientist's Atom and the Philosopher's Stone: How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms. xii + 288 pp., illus., bibl., index. New York: Springer, 2009. $139. [REVIEW]Victor D. Boantza - 2012 - Isis 103 (1):217-218.
Alan Chalmers, The Scientist's Atom and the Philosopher's Stone: How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms. Heidelberg, London and New York: Springer, 2009. Pp xii+287. ISBN 978-90-481-2361-2. £90.00. [REVIEW]Seth Suman - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Science 44 (3):463-465.
Alan Chalmers: The scientist’s atom and the philosopher’s stone: how science succeeded and philosophy failed to gain knowledge of atoms: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 279, Springer, Dordrecht, 2009, 287 plus xi pages, $139.00, , ISBN 978-90-481-2361-2. [REVIEW]Joseph E. Earley - 2010 - Foundations of Chemistry 13 (1):79-83.
The Scientist's Atom and the Philosopher's Stone: How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms. [REVIEW]Karim Bschir - 2012 - Annals of Science 69 (4):575-577.
The Scientist's Atom and the Philosopher's Stone: How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms. [REVIEW]Victor Boantza - 2012 - Isis 103:217-218.
Atom and aether in nineteenth-century physical science.Alan F. Chalmers - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (3):157-166.
How not to integrate the history and philosophy of science: a reply to Chalmers.William R. Newman - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2):203-213.
Science and its Fabrication.Alan Francis Chalmers - 1990 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
Review symposium of the scientist's atom.A. Chalmers - 2010 - Metascience 19 (3):349-371.
Analogy and Conceptual Change, or You can't step into the same mind twice.Eric Dietrich - 2000 - In Eric Dietrich Art Markman (ed.), Cognitive Dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines. Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 265--294.
Did democritus ascribe weight to atoms?Alan Chalmers - 1997 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (3):279 – 287.
Understanding science through its history: a response to Newman.Alan Chalmers - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):150-153.
What does shape a topological atom?Hamidreza Joypazadeh & Shant Shahbazian - 2013 - Foundations of Chemistry 16 (1):63-75.
Boyle on science and the mechanical philosophy: a reply to Chalmers.Andrew Pyle - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):171-186.
The Reality of Jean Perrin's Atoms and Molecules.Robert Hudson - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (1):33-58.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-15

Downloads
20 (#703,484)

6 months
12 (#157,869)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Robert Matthews
University of New South Wales

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

After virtue: a study in moral theory.Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 1981 - Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
Belief, Truth and Knowledge.D. M. Armstrong - 1973 - London,: Cambridge University Press.

View all 70 references / Add more references