Swinging on the Pendulum: Shifting Views of Justice in Human Subjects Research

Hastings Center Report 31 (3):22-24 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Federal policies on human subjects research have undergone a progressive transformation. In the early decades of the twentieth century, federal policies largely relied on the discretion of investigators to decide when and how to conduct research. This approach gradually gave way to policies that augmented investigator discretion with externally imposed protections. We may now be entering an era of even more stringent external protections. Whether the new policies effectively absolve investigators of personal responsibility for conducting ethical research, and whether it is wise to do so, remains to be seen.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Commentary: Staying the Swinging Pendulum.Erica T. Goode - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (3):397-400.
Challenging research on human subjects: justice and uncompensated harms.Stephen Napier - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (1):29-51.
New Rules for Research with Human Participants?Jessica Berg & Nicole Deming - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (6):10-11.
Non-human primates: the appropriate subjects of biomedical research?M. Quigley - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (11):655-658.
Toward Justice in Human Subjects Research.Lisa Sowle Cahill - 2000 - Hastings Center Report 30 (4):45-46.
Reflections on Governance Models for the Clinical Translation of Stem Cells.Jeremy Sugarman - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):251-256.
The ethics and politics of human experimentation.Paul Murray McNeill - 1993 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
14 (#961,492)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The battering of informed consent.M. Kottow - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):565-569.
Still no pill for men? Double standards & demarcating values in biomedical research.Christopher ChoGlueck - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 91 (C):66-76.
The clinical investigator-subject relationship: a contextual approach.David B. Resnik - 2009 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 4:16-.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references