On Some Proposals for Producing Human Stem Cells

National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10 (2):257-264 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author argues that an action is morally wrong if any of its steps serves no purpose apart from preventing the existence of a human being. This principle entails that contraception and some proposed techniques for altered nuclear transfer are morally wrong, but it does not preclude producing stem cells through parthenogenesis. His argument depends on the premise that human life always is a good, including human life produced through immoral actions. The immoral action, not the life caused by the action, is the evil that should be prevented. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10.2 : 257–264.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Induced pluripotent stem cells.Norman Ford - 2011 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 16 (4):4.
Stem Cells, Altered Nuclear Transfer & Ethics.Norman Ford - 2007 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 12 (3):9.
Social experiments in stem cell biology.Melinda B. Fagan - 2011 - Perspectives on Science 19 (3):235-262.
Moral complicity in induced pluripotent stem cell research.Mark T. Brown - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 1-22.
Stem Cell Technology Update.Mariam Ghosn & Ford - 2006 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 12 (1):10.
Stem cell research: An ethical evaluation of policy options.Nikolaus Knoepffler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (1):55-74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-27

Downloads
90 (#186,074)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lawrence Masek
Ohio Dominican University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references