Improving the analogies in contralife arguments: The consistency of catholic teachings about regulating births

Heythrop Journal 49 (3):442-452 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses the analogies that proponents of contralife arguments have used to distinguish contraception from periodic abstinence or natural family planning. I criticize these analogies and present a new analogy that better illustrates how contraception can be contralife when periodic abstinence are not.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,925

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Contralife Argument and the Principle of Double Effect.Lawrence Masek - 2011 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 11 (1):83-97.
A Contralife Argument against Altered Nuclear Transfer.Lawrence Masek - 2006 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 6 (2):235-240.
Contraception and the Contralife Will.R. A. Connor - 1991 - Gregorianum 72 (4):705-723.
Colloquy.Lawrence Masek - 2012 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 12 (2):199-202.
Reconsidering the Contralife Argument and the Principle of Double Effect.Steven Dezort - 2022 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 22 (1):71-81.
The Contralife Argument Revisted.Lawrence Masek - 2022 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 22 (3):509-519.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
87 (#258,582)

6 months
8 (#521,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lawrence Masek
Ohio Dominican University

Citations of this work

Analogical Reasoning in Ethics.Georg Spielthenner - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (5):861-874.

Add more citations