Contempt as a moral attitude

Ethics 113 (2):234-272 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite contemporary moral philosophers' renewed attention to the moral significance of emotions, the attitudinal repertoire with which they equip the mature moral agent remains stunted. One attitude moral philosophers neglect (if not disown) is contempt. While acknowledging the nastiness of contempt, I here correct the neglect by providing an account of the moral psychology of contempt. In the process, I defend the moral propriety of certain tokens of properly person-focused contempt against some prominent objections -- among them, objections stemming from Kantian worries that contempt is incompatible with the respect we owe to persons as such.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
723 (#21,298)

6 months
212 (#11,522)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michelle Mason Bizri
University of Minnesota

Citations of this work

When Artists Fall: Honoring and Admiring the Immoral.Alfred Archer & Benjamin Matheson - 2019 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 5 (2):246-265.
Expressivism and the offensiveness of slurs.Robin Jeshion - 2013 - Philosophical Perspectives 27 (1):231-259.
Respect.Robin S. Dillon - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Wiping the Slate clean: The heart of forgiveness.Lucy Allais - 2008 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (1):33–68.

View all 67 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Love as a moral emotion.J. David Velleman - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):338-374.
The Moralistic Fallacy.Daniel Jacobson - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):65-90.
The Moralistic Fallacy: On the 'Appropriateness' of Emotions.Justin D'Arms & Daniel Jacobson - 2000 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):65-90.

View all 8 references / Add more references