Colloquy

The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 12 (2):199-202 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I respond to Rev. Jonah Pollock's criticisms of my argument about the contralife argument and the principle of double effect.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.5840/ncbq201212245

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Introduction: B for Bad Cinema.Julia Vassilleva & Claire Perkins - 2009 - Colloquy 18:5-15.
Editorial.[author unknown] - 2004 - Colloquy 8.
Editorial.[author unknown] - 2003 - Colloquy 7.
Editorial.[author unknown] - 2002 - Colloquy 6.
Editorial.[author unknown] - 2011 - Colloquy 21:3-3.
Tai Po.Danny Huppatz - 2004 - Colloquy 8.
Four Poems.Dan Disney - 2005 - Colloquy 9:188-190.
Subtopia. [REVIEW]Jay Thompson - 2006 - Colloquy 11:278-280.
Aelfric's Colloquy.G. N. Garmonsway (ed.) - 1905 - Liverpool University Press.
M.Anthony Banks - 2005 - Colloquy 10:332-336.
Blood.John Ryan - 2010 - Colloquy 19:145-146.
Carnivore.Tassos Kapernaros - 2003 - Colloquy 7.
The Passage. [REVIEW]Jasna Novakovic - 2002 - Colloquy 6.
The Emblem. [REVIEW]Barbara Ghattas - 2005 - Colloquy 9:153-155.
Three Poems.Caleb Puckett - 2006 - Colloquy 13:172-174.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
31 (#501,295)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lawrence Masek
Ohio Dominican University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references