- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A Contralife Argument against Altered Nuclear Transfer
The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 6 (2):235-240 (2006)
Abstract
I argue that the contralife argument, which new natural law theorists have proposed as an argument against contraception, also would rule out altered nuclear transfer, which has been proposed as a way of procuring human stem cells without destroying human embryos.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Treating Humanity as an Inviolable End: An Analysis of Contraception and Altered Nuclear Transfer.Lawrence Masek - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (1):1-16.
The Contralife Argument and the Principle of Double Effect.Lawrence Masek - 2011 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 11 (1):83-97.
Altered Nuclear Transfer, Genom-Metaphysik und das Argument der Potentialität.Christoph Rehmann-Sutter - 2006 - Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft Und Ethik 11 (1):351-374.
" Altered Nuclear Transfer" Probing the Nature of Being Human.Paul J. Hoehner - 2005 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 5 (2):261-269.
Improving the analogies in contralife arguments: The consistency of catholic teachings about regulating births.Lawrence Masek - 2008 - Heythrop Journal 49 (3):442-452.
An ironic reductio for a 'pro-life' argument:1 Hurlbut's proposal for stem cell research.Kevin Elliott - 2007 - Bioethics 21 (2):98–110.
Altered Nuclear Transfer, Gift, and Mystery.J. Thomas Petri - 2007 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 7 (4):729-747.
Stem Cells, Nuclear Transfer and Respect for Embryos.Jens Clausen - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (1):48-59.
The significance of induced pluripotent stem cells for basic research and clinical therapy.J. R. Meyer - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (12):849-851.
Why human "altered nuclear transfer" is unethical: a holistic systems view.W. Malcolm Byrnes - 2005 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 5 (2):271-279.
Altered Nuclear Transfer, Gift, and Mystery.J. Thomas Petri - 2007 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 7 (4):729-747.
Seeking Consensus: A Clarification and Defense of Altered Nuclear Transfer.William B. Hurlbut, Robert P. George & Markus Grompe - 2006 - Hastings Center Report 36 (5):42-50.
Altered Nuclear Transfer as a Morally Acceptable Means for the Procurement of Human Embryonic Stem Cells.William B. Hurlbut - 2005 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 5 (1):145-151.
Alternate nuclear transfer is no alternative for embryonic stem cell research.John A. Fennel - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (2):84–91.
An Examination of a Moral Argument against Nuclear Deterrence.Robert McKim - 1985 - Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):279 - 297.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-02-08
Downloads
57 (#275,172)
6 months
8 (#342,364)
2009-02-08
Downloads
57 (#275,172)
6 months
8 (#342,364)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Treating Humanity as an Inviolable End: An Analysis of Contraception and Altered Nuclear Transfer.Lawrence Masek - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (1):1-16.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo