A Contralife Argument against Altered Nuclear Transfer

The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 6 (2):235-240 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that the contralife argument, which new natural law theorists have proposed as an argument against contraception, also would rule out altered nuclear transfer, which has been proposed as a way of procuring human stem cells without destroying human embryos.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

15325490

DOI

10.5840/ncbq20066248

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,148

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Treating Humanity as an Inviolable End: An Analysis of Contraception and Altered Nuclear Transfer.Lawrence Masek - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (1):1-16.
The Moral Status of Human Embryos and Other Possible Sources of Stem Cells.Lawrence Masek - 2017 - In Jason T. Eberl, Contemporary Controversies in Catholic Bioethics. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 331-343.
Contraception as Contralife.Anthony McCarthy - 2016 - In Ethical Sex: Sexual Choices and their Nature and Meaning. South Bend, USA: Fidelity Press. pp. 34-65.
Altered Nuclear Transfer as a Morally Acceptable Means for the Procurement of Human Embryonic Stem Cells.William B. Hurlbut - 2005 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 5 (1):145-151.
The Contralife Argument Revisted.Lawrence Masek - 2022 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 22 (3):509-519.
Colloquy.Lawrence Masek - 2012 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 12 (2):199-202.
The Contralife Argument and the Principle of Double Effect.Lawrence Masek - 2011 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 11 (1):83-97.
On Some Proposals for Producing Human Stem Cells.Lawrence Masek - 2010 - National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10 (2):257-264.
Stem Cells, Nuclear Transfer and Respect for Embryos.Jens Clausen - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (1):48-59.
Reconsidering the Contralife Argument and the Principle of Double Effect.Steven Dezort - 2022 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 22 (1):71-81.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-08

Downloads
65 (#355,913)

6 months
3 (#1,170,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lawrence Masek
Ohio Dominican University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references