Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):39-58 (2010)

Abstract
abstractIn this article I consider whether the legalization of sex‐same marriage implies a right to incestuous marriage. I begin by suggesting that the liberal state get out of the ‘marriage’ business by leveling down to a universal civil union status. The question is then whether incestuous unions should be both legal and eligible for this status. I argue that the arguments compatible with public reason for prohibiting them outright, or even for excluding them from the permissible types of legally registered partnerships, are quite weak. The objections to allowing such relations are those from child abuse; unfair burdening of society; and the creation of bad lives. I argue that while rape and other forms of child abuse would be no more legal or tolerated than they are now, the concern about any form of weakening a society's legal and political resources to combat such abuses does indeed register on the justificatory scale, but does not prove that such first‐degree incestuous sexual relations are inherently bad enough to warrant intervention in their own right. I then argue that the concern about unfairly burdening society with unhealthy persons is not as dangerously totalitarian as we might initially fear, but nor is it strong enough to justify an outright prohibition. Finally, I argue that a concern to dissuade persons from creating certain kinds of lives is also not as dangerously totalitarian as we might initially fear, and in fact goes further towards explaining why we might have a legitimate interest in intervening. Nonetheless, I argue that the criminalization of such acts only make sense when they are indicators of other offenses, namely negligence or abuse, and it thus seems that the act of consanguineous reproduction is itself insufficient.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/japp.2010.27.issue-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,464
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Should Teachers Be Authentic?Lauren Bialystok - 2015 - Ethics and Education 10 (3):313-326.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

After Marriage: Rethinking Marital Relationships.Elizabeth Brake (ed.) - 2016 - Oxford University Press USA.
The Liberal Case for Disestablishing Marriage.Tamara Metz - 2007 - Contemporary Political Theory 6 (2):196-217.
Marriage and the Public Good.Anthony E. Giampietro - 2007 - Christian Bioethics 13 (2):211-224.
A Defense of Same-Sex Marriage.Avrum Stroll - 2009 - Public Affairs Quarterly 23 (4):343-355.
Kant's Sexual Contract.Hanley Ryan - 2014 - Journal of Politics 76:914-27.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-20

Total views
7 ( #1,072,226 of 2,520,772 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,623 of 2,520,772 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes