What is Leibniz's argument for the identity of indiscernibles in his correspondence with Clarke?

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):315 – 333 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Leibniz-Clarke correspondence: together with extracts from Newton's Principia and Opticks.Samuel Clarke - 1956 - New York: Barnes & Noble. Edited by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Isaac Newton & H. G. Alexander.
The Leibniz-Clarke correspondence.Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz & Samuel Clarke - 1956 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
Exclusion principle and the identity of indiscernibles: A response to Margenau's argument.Michela Massimi - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):303--30.
Two spheres, twenty spheres, and the identity of indiscernibles.Michael Della Rocca - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):480–492.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#293,581)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The identity of indiscernibles.Max Black - 1952 - Mind 61 (242):153-164.
Choice without Preference.N. Rescher - 1959 - Société Française de Philosophie, Bulletin 51:142.
The Identity of Indiscernibles.A. J. Ayer - 1953 - Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of Philosophy 3:124-129.

View all 7 references / Add more references