Voluntary Active Euthanasia and the Doctrine of Double Effect: A View from Germany

Health Care Analysis 12 (3):225-240 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper discusses physician-assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanasia, supplies a short history and argues in favour of permitting both once rigid criteria have been set and the cases retro-reviewed. I suggest that among these criteria should be that VAE should only be permitted with one more necessary criterion: that VAE should only be allowed when physician assisted suicide is not a possible option. If the patient is able to ingest and absorb the medication there is no reason why VAE should be permitted. A brief history of VAE and PAS is given and some of the arguments which have been given are analyzed. The Principle of the Double Effect is briefly discussed and why, in my opinion, it is not a valid principle is briefly discussed



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ending Life, Morality, and Meaning.Jukka Varelius - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):559-574.
Voluntary euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and the goals of medicine.Jukka Varelius - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (2):121 – 137.


Added to PP

78 (#157,812)

6 months
6 (#134,356)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Summa Theologica (1273).Thomas Aquinas - 1947 - New York: Benziger Bros..
Voluntary active euthanasia.Dan W. Brock - 1992 - Hastings Center Report 22 (2):10-22.
Euthanasia, Ethics, and Public Policy: An Argument Against Legalisation.John Keown - 2002 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Consent and end of life decisions.J. Harris - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (1):10-15.

View all 14 references / Add more references