Voluntary Active Euthanasia and the Doctrine of Double Effect: A View from Germany
Health Care Analysis 12 (3):225-240 (2004)
Abstract
This paper discusses physician-assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanasia, supplies a short history and argues in favour of permitting both once rigid criteria have been set and the cases retro-reviewed. I suggest that among these criteria should be that VAE should only be permitted with one more necessary criterion: that VAE should only be allowed when physician assisted suicide is not a possible option. If the patient is able to ingest and absorb the medication there is no reason why VAE should be permitted. A brief history of VAE and PAS is given and some of the arguments which have been given are analyzed. The Principle of the Double Effect is briefly discussed and why, in my opinion, it is not a valid principle is briefly discussedAuthor's Profile
DOI
10.1023/b:hcan.0000044929.45563.4f
My notes
Similar books and articles
One Physician's Perspective: Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide. [REVIEW]Perry A. Pugno - 2004 - Health Care Analysis 12 (3):215-223.
A History of Ideas Concerning the Morality of Suicide, Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia.Craig Paterson - 2009 - In Rajitha Tadikonda (ed.), Physician Assisted Euthanasia. Icfai University Press.
Voluntary Euthanasia, Physician-Assisted Suicide, and the Right to do Wrong.Jukka Varelius - 2013 - HEC Forum 25 (3):1-15.
Neonatal euthanasia is unsupportable: The groningen protocol should be abandoned.Alexander A. Kon - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (5):453-463.
Physician‐assisted suicide, the doctrine of double effect, and the ground of value.F. M. Kamm - 1999 - Ethics 109 (3):586-605.
‘Debating the Morality and Legality of Medically Assisted Dying’. Critical Notice of Emily Jackson and John Keown, Debating Euthanasia. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012. [REVIEW]Robert Young - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):151-160.
The doctrine of double effect: Reflections on theoretical and practical issues.Frances M. Kamm - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):571-585.
Ending Life, Morality, and Meaning.Jukka Varelius - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):559-574.
The body as unwarranted life support: a new perspective on euthanasia.David Shaw - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (9):519-521.
Moral fiction or moral fact? The distinction between doing and allowing in medical ethics.Thomas S. Huddle - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (5):257-262.
Managing intentions: The end-of-life administration of analgesics and sedatives, and the possibility of slow euthanasia.Charles Douglas, Ian Kerridge & Rachel Ankeny - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (7):388-396.
The principle of double-effect in a clinical context.Rainer Dziewas, Christoph Kellinghaus & Peter S.�R.�S. - 2003 - Poiesis and Praxis 1 (3):211-218.
Voluntary euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and the goals of medicine.Jukka Varelius - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (2):121 – 137.
Advance directives for voluntary euthanasia: A volatile combination?Leslie Pickering Francis - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (3):297-322.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-24
Downloads
78 (#157,812)
6 months
6 (#134,356)
2010-08-24
Downloads
78 (#157,812)
6 months
6 (#134,356)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Causation, Responsibility, and Harm: How the Discursive Shift from Law and Ethics to Social Justice Sealed the Plight of Nonhuman Animals.Matti Häyry - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (2):246-267.
References found in this work
Euthanasia, Ethics, and Public Policy: An Argument Against Legalisation.John Keown - 2002 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.