Transcendental Arguments for Personal Identity in Kant’s Transcendental Deduction

Philo 14 (2):109-136 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of the principle aims of the B version of Kant’s transcendental deduction is to show how it is possible that the same “I think” can accompany all of my representations, which is a transcendental condition of the possibility of judgment. Contra interpreters such as A. Brook, I show that this “I think” is an a priori (reflected) self-consciousness; contra P. Keller, I show that this a priori self-consciousness is first and foremost a consciousness of one’s personal identity from a first person point of view.

Similar books and articles

The Proof Structure of Kant's A-Deduction.Michael Barker - 2001 - Kant Studien 92 (3):259-282.
Kant’s Deduction and Apperception: Explaining the Categories.Dennis Schulting - 2012 - London and Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Kant's thinker.Patricia Kitcher - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Strawson's transcendental deduction of other minds.J. L. Martin - 1974 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy (Suppl.) 159 (2):159-169.
Kant's response to skepticism.Robert Stern - 2008 - In John Greco (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press. pp. 265.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-12

Downloads
858 (#16,294)

6 months
119 (#28,895)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jacqueline Mariña
Purdue University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Self-reference and self-awareness.Sydney S. Shoemaker - 1968 - Journal of Philosophy 65 (October):555-67.
Kant on self-identity.Patricia Kitcher - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (1):41-72.

Add more references