Study on Agriculture Decision-Makers Behavior on Sustainable Energy Utilization

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (3):679-689 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Phytomass cultivation for energy use is increasingly popular in Europe for high profits guaranteed by subsidy. Although public interest in ecology is on an increasing level, direct combustion is still preferred even though scholars have been warning about formations of hazardous compounds for a long-time. However, the reduction of subsidies would negatively affect an already bad situation in Czech agriculture, since most farmers became fully dependent on subsidies due to quotas, restrictions, and other unequal business conditions in European Union. It was proved in a commercial scale that an alternative phytomass energy utilizing technology consisting of steam explosion and subsequent anaerobic fermentation may be run solely on the waste heat without any further addition of chemicals. Behavior analysis of present and future agriculture decision-makers showed that none of the farmers who visited the facility cared about ecological consequences. On the other hand, ost students from the Faculty of Agriculture and the Faculty of the Economy answered the questionnaire with higher environmental responsibility. We assume this is caused by high average age of farmers in Czech Republic who are more aware of the ongoing economical difficulties and perceive differently the risk of higher acquisition costs

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Biotechnology is compatible with sustainable agriculture.Donald Duvick - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):112-125.
Normative Dimensions of Sustainable Energy Policy.Sanya Carley - 2011 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (2):211 - 229.
Sustainable agriculture is humane, humane agriculture is sustainable.Michael C. Appleby - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):293-303.
Animal agriculture: Symbiosis, culture, or ethical conflict? [REVIEW]Vonne Lund & I. Anna S. Olsson - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1):47-56.
Environmental utilization space between science and politics.Volkert Beekman - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (3):293-300.
The morality behind sustainability.Jeffrey Burkhardt - 1989 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2 (2):113-128.
Environmental Care in Agriculture: A Social Perspective. [REVIEW]Melania Salazar-Ordóñez & Samir Sayadi - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (3):243-258.
Environmental and social implications of waste in U.s. Agriculture and food sectors.David Pimentel - 1990 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (1):5-20.
Basic principles of agroecology and sustainable agriculture.V. G. Thomas & P. G. Kevan - 1993 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6 (1):1-19.
Advance planning and proxy decision makers.George J. Annas - 1992 - Ethics and Behavior 2 (1):67 – 68.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-26

Downloads
29 (#521,313)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?