Ethics and Information Technology 23 (3):363-372 (2021)

Lavinia Marin
Delft University of Technology
This article explores the norms that govern regular users’ acts of sharing content on social networking sites. Many debates on how to counteract misinformation on Social Networking Sites focus on the epistemic norms of testimony, implicitly assuming that the users’ acts of sharing should fall under the same norms as those for posting original content. I challenge this assumption by proposing a non-epistemic interpretation of information sharing on social networking sites which I construe as infrastructures for forms of life found online. Misinformation sharing belongs more in the realm of rumour spreading and gossiping rather than in the information-giving language games. However, the norms for sharing cannot be fixed in advance, as these emerge at the interaction between the platforms’ explicit rules, local norms established by user practices, and a meta-norm of sociality. This unpredictability does not leave us with a normative void as an important user responsibility still remains, namely that of making the context of the sharing gesture explicit. If users will clarify how their gestures of sharing are meant to be interpreted by others, they will implicitly assume responsibility for possible misunderstandings based on omissions, and the harms of shared misinformation can be diminished.
Keywords misinformation  sharing  social networking sites  epistemic norms  responsibility  gossip  social media
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10676-021-09578-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,160
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Stop Talking About Fake News!Josh Habgood-Coote - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62 (9-10):1033-1065.
Fake News and Partisan Epistemology.Regina Rini - 2017 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27 (S2):43-64.
Do Artifacts Have Politics?Langdon Winner - 1980 - Daedalus 109 (1):121--136.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sharing as Speech Act.Emanuele Arielli - 2018 - Versus 127:243-258.
Contextual Gaps: Privacy Issues on Facebook.Gordon Hull, Heather Richter Lipford & Celine Latulipe - 2011 - Ethics and Information Technology 13 (4):289-302.
Ethical Considerations of Using Information Obtained From Online File Sharing Sites.Aimee van Wynsberghe & Jeroen van der Ham - 2015 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 13 (3/4):256-267.
Qualities of Sharing and Their Transformations in the Digital Age.Andreas Wittel - 2011 - International Review of Information Ethics 15 (9):2011.
Performing the Discourse of Sexuality Online.David Kreps - 2013 - In Steven Warburton & Stylianos Hatzipanagos (eds.), Digital Identity and Social Media. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. pp. 118-132.
Impact of Privacy, Trust and User Activity on Intentions to Share Facebook Photos.Aqdas Malik, Kari Hiekkanen, Amandeep Dhir & Marko Nieminen - 2016 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 14 (4):364-382.
The Erosion of Ethics: From Citizen Journalism to Social Media.Jessica Roberts - 2019 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 17 (4):409-421.
The Practice of Networking: An Ethical Approach.Domènec Melé - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (S4):487 - 503.


Added to PP index

Total views
24 ( #471,075 of 2,499,436 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #80,217 of 2,499,436 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes