Political Theory 40 (3):319-346 (2012)

Abstract
Some scholars have argued that religiously injurious speech poses a serious problem for secular liberal thought. It has been suggested that secular liberal thought and political practice often misrecognize the nature of the injury involved in speech that violates the sacred and that much secular thought about religious injury (and free exercise more generally) is premised on unacknowledged Protestant conceptions of what real religion is. In this essay, I argue against the ideas that secular liberalism tends to treat religion only as a matter of freely chosen belief and that the unchosen, habituated nature of much religious experience raises a problem for the defense of speech that violates the sacred. I argue that secular thought and practice should remain very concerned about the social and political harms of speech directed unambiguously at social groups but need not eliminate the gap between religious attachments and religious persons
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0090591712439304
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rescuing Toleration.Anna Elisabetta Galeotti - 2019 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-21.
Rescuing Toleration.Anna Elisabetta Galeotti - 2021 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 24 (1):87-107.
Islam and the Legal Enforcement of Morality.Christian Joppke - 2014 - Theory and Society 43 (6):589-615.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What is Free Speech?David Braddon-Mitchell & Caroline West - 2004 - Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (4):437-460.
The Free Speech Argument Against Pornography.Caroline West - 2003 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (3):391 - 422.
A Defence of Free Speech.Richard McDonough - 1989 - In Cedric Pan Jaganathan Muraleenathan (ed.), Thinking about Democracy. pp. 61-84.
On Racist Hate Speech and the Scope of a Free Speech Principle.Mary Kate McGowan & Ishani Maitra - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23 (2):343-372.
Free Speech and Illocution.Rae Langton & Jennifer Hornsby - 1998 - Legal Theory 4 (1):21-37.
A Perfectionist Defense of Free Speech.J. Miles - 2012 - Social Theory and Practice 38 (2):213-230.
Does Freedom of Speech Include Hate Speech?Caleb Yong - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (4):385-403.
Free Speech and Offensive Expression.Judith Wagner DeCew - 2004 - Social Philosophy and Policy 21 (2):81-103.
Free Speech.Alan Haworth - 1998 - Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-09-30

Total views
41 ( #278,739 of 2,519,857 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,857 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes