Runway performance of normal and anosmic rats as a function of reward magnitude: A preliminary report

, &
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 2 (6):375-376 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03334417

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Runway performance of normal, sham, and anosmic rats as a function of magnitude of reward and magnitude shift.Stephen F. Davis, Wyatt E. Harper & John D. Seago - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (4):367-369.
Relative magnitude of end-box reward: Effects upon performance throughout the double runway.Vincent Di Lollo & James Allison - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 87 (2):248.
Performance in differential conditioning as a function of variation in magnitude of reward.Henry Goldstein & Kenneth W. Spence - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):86.
Runway performance as a function of the schedule and magnitude of water reward.Patrick E. Campbell, Thomas A. Hinson & Brian M. Kruger - 1977 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 10 (1):69-72.
Runway performance under "horn of plenty" conditions versus gradual diminution of reward supply.Glen D. Jensen & Robert P. Rey - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (1p1):7.
Effects of magnitude and percentage of reward on subsequent patterns of runway speed.Winfred F. Hill & William P. Wallace - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (4p1):544.
Runway extinction as a joint function of acquisition reward percentage and extinction punishment intensity.Richard G. Ratliff & Keith N. Clayton - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):574.
Differential magnitude of reward conditioning as a function of predifferential reward magnitude.John R. Platt & Robert A. Gay - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (3p1):393.
Changes in performance as a function of shifts in the magnitude of reinforcement.George Collier & Melvin H. Marx - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (5):305.
Resistance to extinction as a joint function of reward magnitude and the spacing of extinction trials.Winfred F. Hill & Norman E. Spear - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (6):636.
Instrumental and competing behavior as a function of trials and reward magnitude.A. C. Pereboom & B. M. Crawford - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (1):82.
Frustrative facilitation effects of nonzero reward magnitude reduction on goal-box activity and runway locomotion.Richard L. Patten - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (1):160.
A contrast effect in differential conditioning.Gordon H. Bower - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (2):196.
Reward magnitude effects as a function of within-day trial-by-trial analysis.Stephen F. Davis & John D. Seago - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 16 (5):363-366.
Percentage of reinforcement and reward magnitude effects in a T maze: Between and within subjects.Norman E. Spear & William B. Pavlik - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (4):521.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
16 (#886,588)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven Davis
Simon Fraser University

Citations of this work

Differential conditioning as a function of surgical anosmia.Stephen F. Davis & John D. Seago - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (1):10-12.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references