Ragioni per l’azione, norme e contesto della scelta: riflessioni sull’utilità attesa e sul conseguenzialismo
Teoria 25 (1):93-116 (
2005)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
The paper deals with the received view, shared by many social scientists, of expected utility theory as a descriptive and prescriptive vision both of right action and of right procedure of thought. It states that in the classical formulation of the theory there are scarce hints for such a monistic interpretation, which does not pay justice to the pluralistic reality of the reason for action