Positive and negative logic
AbstractActs of criticism characteristically display a negative and a positive dimension. I undertake a qualified defense of the thesis that both dimensions are essential, at least in the case of logical criticism – criticism that relies either implicitly or explicitly on the resources of logic. Such criticism presupposes at least a minimal grasp on what is involved in ‘getting it right’ in the domain that is subjected to critique. In making the case I distinguish between positive and negative logic. Traditional logic is positive insofar as it takes as primitive a positive notion, typically truth. I consider to what extent logic might be reconstructed on an exclusively negative basis – as a tool for avoiding falsity and fallacy. Negative logic faces serious obstacles which suggest a prima facie case that logical criticism is essentially, not just accidentally, positive.
Similar books and articles
What is "the ineffable" exactly? An extensive reading of Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.Hong Li & Donghui Han - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):402-411.
Schelling's Late Negative Philosophy: Crisis and Critique of Pure Reason.Marcela García - 2011 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 3 (2):141-164.
Being Positive About Negative Facts.Mark Jago & Stephen Barker - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):117-138.
Answer to a problem raised by J. Robinson: The arithmetic of positive or negative integers is definable from successor and divisibility.Denis Richard - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (4):927-935.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads