Pictorial Aesthetics and Two Kinds of Inflected Seeing-In

Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 53 (1):74-92 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Inflected seeing-in is a special experience of the vehicle and subject of a picture, which are experienced as related to each other. Bence Nanay recently defended the idea that inflected picture perception is central to the aesthetic appreciation of pictures. Here I critically discuss his characterization of inflection, and advance a new one, that better accounts for the structure and content of inflected experience in terms of properties of the pictures themselves and also clarifies the distinctive contribution of inflection to pictorial aesthetics. Two kinds of inflected seeing-in are distinguished in terms of two functions the design properties of a picture can realize. One kind of inflected seeing-in allows us to experience how the picture design sustains what is seen in the picture and is responsible for the representation of the picture subject. The second kind, which is only supported by some pictures, also captures how properties of the vehicle alter or enrich the picture content so as to elicit an experience of the depicted subject as having properties it could not be seen as having in face-to-face experience. This inflected experience is distinctively associated with our visual experience of the aesthetically valuable relations between vehicle and content which are unique to pictorial representation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why, as responsible for figurativity, seeing-in can only be inflected seeing-in.Alberto Voltolini - 2015 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (3):651-667.
Inflected and uninflected perception of pictures.Bence Nanay - 2010 - In Catharine Abell & Katerina Bantinaki (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Depiction. Oxford University Press.
Inflected Pictorial Experience: Its Treatment and Significance.Robert Hopkins - 2010 - In Catharine Abell & Katerina Bantinaki (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Depiction. Oxford University Press. pp. 151.
Pictorial experience and seeing.Michael Newall - 2009 - British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (2):129-141.
Pictorial experience: not so special after all.Alon Chasid - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 171 (3):471-491.
Structure, Intention and Representation.Göran Hermeren - 1977 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 3 (1):89-106.
How to Reconcile Seeing-As with Seeing-In (with Mimetic Purposes in Mind). Voltolini - 2012 - In G. Currie, P. Kot’Atko & M. Pokorny (eds.), Rivista di Estetica. College Publications. pp. 99-113.
Hallucinatory Pictures.Roberto Casati - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (3):365-368.
Why the pictorial relation is not reference.Alon Chasid - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (3):226-247.
Three depictive views defended.John Dilworth - 2002 - British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (3):259-278.
Pictures, presence and visibility.Solveig Aasen - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (1):187-203.
Pictorial Experience and Intentionalism.Alon Chasid - 2014 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (4):405-416.
A Syncretistic Theory of Depiction.Alberto Voltolini - 2015 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Perceiving pictures.Bence Nanay - 2011 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (4):461-480.
The Naturalism of Pictorial Representation.Douglas John Dempster - 1983 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-29

Downloads
72 (#219,810)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Giulia Martina
Universität Konstanz

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Attention and perceptual content.Bence Nanay - 2010 - Analysis 70 (2):263-270.
On pictorial representation.Richard Wollheim - 1998 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56 (3):217-226.
Inflected Pictorial Experience: Its Treatment and Significance.Robert Hopkins - 2010 - In Catharine Abell & Katerina Bantinaki (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Depiction. Oxford University Press. pp. 151.
apresentação.Rogério Lopes - 2013 - Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 54 (128):281-285.
Why, as responsible for figurativity, seeing-in can only be inflected seeing-in.Alberto Voltolini - 2015 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (3):651-667.

View all 10 references / Add more references