Identifying the Correlations Between the Semantics and the Phonology of American Sign Language and British Sign Language: A Vector Space Approach

Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Over the history of research on sign languages, much scholarship has highlighted the pervasive presence of signs whose forms relate to their meaning in a non-arbitrary way. The presence of these forms suggests that sign language vocabularies are shaped, at least in part, by a pressure toward maintaining a link between form and meaning in wordforms. We use a vector space approach to test the ways this pressure might shape sign language vocabularies, examining how non-arbitrary forms are distributed within the lexicons of two unrelated sign languages. Vector space models situate the representations of words in a multi-dimensional space where the distance between words indexes their relatedness in meaning. Using phonological information from the vocabularies of American Sign Language and British Sign Language, we tested whether increased similarity between the semantic representations of signs corresponds to increased phonological similarity. The results of the computational analysis showed a significant positive relationship between phonological form and semantic meaning for both sign languages, which was strongest when the sign language lexicons were organized into clusters of semantically related signs. The analysis also revealed variation in the strength of patterns across the form-meaning relationships seen between phonological parameters within each sign language, as well as between the two languages. This shows that while the connection between form and meaning is not entirely language specific, there are cross-linguistic differences in how these mappings are realized for signs in each language, suggesting that arbitrariness as well as cognitive or cultural influences may play a role in how these patterns are realized. The results of this analysis not only contribute to our understanding of the distribution of non-arbitrariness in sign language lexicons, but also demonstrate a new way that computational modeling can be harnessed in lexicon-wide investigations of sign languages.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tegn som Språk.Sissel Redse Jørgensen & Rani Lill Anjum (eds.) - 2006 - Gyldendal Akademisk.
Language is shaped by the body.Mark Aronoff, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (5):509-511.
Transition to Language.Alison Wray (ed.) - 2002 - Oxford University Press UK.
On Translating Sache in Hegel’s Texts.James H. Wilkinson - 1996 - The Owl of Minerva 27 (2):211-226.
Along the time line.Sandro Zucchi - 2009 - Natural Language Semantics 17 (2):99-139.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-09

Downloads
10 (#1,219,902)

6 months
7 (#491,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?