How the Weight of the Ethical Arguments Depends on the Empirical “Facts”

American Journal of Bioethics 13 (9):53-55 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two concepts of empirical ethics.Malcolm Parker - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (4):202-213.
Moral disagreement and moral expertise.Sarah McGrath - 2008 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics: Volume 3. Oxford University Press. pp. 87-108.
Scepticism, context and modal reasoning.Andrej Ule - 2004 - Acta Analytica 19 (33):9-30.
Does Knowledge Depend on Truth?Nick Zangwill - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (2):139-144.
Externalism, architecturalism, and epistemic warrant.Martin Davies - 1998 - In Crispin Wright, Barry C. Smith & Cynthia Macdonald (eds.), Knowing Our Own Minds. Oxford University Press. pp. 321-363.
The Standard-Relational Theory of 'Ought' and the Oughtistic Theory of Reasons.Daan Evers - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):131-147.
Truth and freedom.Trenton Merricks - 2009 - Philosophical Review 118 (1):29-57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-26

Downloads
33 (#470,805)

6 months
10 (#257,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?