Hutcheson and Hume on Explaining the Nature of Morality: Why It Is Mistaken to Suppose Hume Ever Raised the "Is-Ought" Question

History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (3):277 - 289 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hume's Alleged Success over Hutcheson.Noriaki Iwasa - 2011 - Synthesis Philosophica 26 (2):323-336.
Sentimentalism and the Is-Ought Problem.Noriaki Iwasa - 2011 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (3):323-352.
Hume on morality.James Baillie - 2000 - New York: Routledge.
Hume and a Worry about Simplicity.Stewart Duncan - 2009 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 26 (2):139-157.
A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
Walls and Vaults.[author unknown] - 2009 - Wiley.
Waiting for Hume.Peter Lipton - 2005 - In Marina Frasca-Spada & P. J. E. Kail (eds.), Impressions of Hume. Oxford University Press. pp. 59.
David Hume and eighteenth-century America.Mark G. Spencer - 2005 - Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Miracles and the Uniformity of Nature.Michael Root - 1989 - American Philosophical Quarterly 26 (4):333 - 342.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
42 (#370,011)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references