Gödel's conceptual realism

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11 (2):207-224 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Kurt Gödel is almost as famous—one might say “notorious”—for his extreme platonist views as he is famous for his mathematical theorems. Moreover his platonism is not a myth; it is well-documented in his writings. Here are two platonist declarations about set theory, the first from his paper about Bertrand Russell and the second from the revised version of his paper on the Continuum Hypotheses.Classes and concepts may, however, also be conceived as real objects, namely classes as “pluralities of things” or as structures consisting of a plurality of things and concepts as the properties and relations of things existing independently of our definitions and constructions.It seems to me that the assumption of such objects is quite as legitimate as the assumption of physical bodies and there is quite as much reason to believe in their existence.But, despite their remoteness from sense experience, we do have something like a perception also of the objects of set theory, as is seen from the fact that the axioms force themselves upon us as being true. I don't see any reason why we should have less confidence in this kind of perception, i.e., in mathematical intuition, than in sense perception.The first statement is a platonist declaration of a fairly standard sort concerning set theory. What is unusual in it is the inclusion of concepts among the objects of mathematics. This I will explain below. The second statement expresses what looks like a rather wild thesis.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,199

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

434 (#25,368)

6 months
3 (#224,882)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Donald A. Martin
University of California, Los Angeles

References found in this work

Philosophy of mathematics, selected readings.Paul Benacerraf & Hilary Putnam - 1966 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 156:501-502.
The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell.Paul Weiss - 1945 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5 (4):594-599.

Add more references