Field’s saving truth from paradox: Some things it doesn’t do
Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):339-347 (2011)
Abstract
I will discuss Fields Outline of a Theory of Truth. I will point out important properties of Kripkeleast fixed points constructions and theory. I do this not to demean Field’s superb work on truth but rather to suggest that there may be no really satisfactory conditional connective for languages containing their own truth predicatesAuthor's Profile
DOI
10.1017/s1755020311000037
My notes
Similar books and articles
Truth, logical validity and determinateness: A commentary on field’s saving truth from paradox.P. D. Welch - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):348-359.
Saving the truth schema from paradox.Hartry Field - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (1):1-27.
Field's Paradox and Its Medieval Solution.Stephen Read - 2010 - History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (2):161-176.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-01
Downloads
31 (#378,890)
6 months
3 (#224,882)
2013-12-01
Downloads
31 (#378,890)
6 months
3 (#224,882)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Principles for Object-Linguistic Consequence: from Logical to Irreflexive.Carlo Nicolai & Lorenzo Rossi - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 47 (3):549-577.
Ungroundedness in Tarskian Languages.Saul Kripke - 2019 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 48 (3):603-609.
Paradox and Logical Revision. A Short Introduction.Julien Murzi & Massimiliano Carrara - 2015 - Topoi 34 (1):7-14.
References found in this work
Ultimate truth vis- à- vis stable truth.P. D. Welch - 2008 - Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (1):126-142.
