Field’s saving truth from paradox: Some things it doesn’t do

Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):339-347 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I will discuss Fields Outline of a Theory of Truth. I will point out important properties of Kripkeleast fixed points constructions and theory. I do this not to demean Field’s superb work on truth but rather to suggest that there may be no really satisfactory conditional connective for languages containing their own truth predicates



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,199

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

31 (#378,890)

6 months
3 (#224,882)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Donald A. Martin
University of California, Los Angeles

Citations of this work

Naïve validity.Julien Murzi & Lorenzo Rossi - 2017 - Synthese 199 (Suppl 3):819-841.
Some observations on truth hierarchies.P. D. Welch - 2014 - Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):1-30.
Ungroundedness in Tarskian Languages.Saul Kripke - 2019 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 48 (3):603-609.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Outline of a theory of truth.Saul Kripke - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):690-716.
Ultimate truth vis- à- vis stable truth.P. D. Welch - 2008 - Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (1):126-142.
Games for truth.P. D. Welch - 2009 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 15 (4):410-427.

Add more references